This is an excerpt from “Back of the Envelope” — where I share interesting, SE-related things I learned recently (in 5 minutes or less).
If you enjoyed reading it, subscribe at the end of the post to be one of the first to get new emails (every Thursday).
Today, I will talk about a webcast that happened in March called “For the Betterment of the Structural Engineering Profession.”
I’ll give you a brief overview of what went down and tell you my take.
Let’s dive in.
(Estimated read time: 3 minutes and 52 seconds)
So the good people at CASE, NCESEA, and SEI did an hour-long virtual “town hall meeting” to update us on their vision of the profession and what they are doing to get there.
(Don’t know the acronyms? Don’t feel bad; me neither. ‘S’ stands for structural.)
The official “vision” can be viewed here if you are interested (second page). There are quite a few big words in there (which I am sure they’ve put a lot of thought into), but that also means it takes quite a bit of effort to digest.
To save you some time, this is my shortened version of the vision:
(Really, I think that's what they are trying to say.)
Now, with that vision, they came up with ten key initiatives. It’s mostly stuff you’ve heard people talking about, like developing leaders, advancing the profession, encouraging resilience, improving mentoring, etc. (you can read the full list here).
They showed the result of a poll they did recently to see which one people cared about the most (I took a screenshot):
The webcast then went over each one, and the panelist talked about what they are doing for each initiative.
It would be nice if they put that down on a website somewhere, but from what I can remember, a lot of it is “we’ve set up committees who have many things down in the pipeline…etc.” (Sorry I am probably not doing them justice here.)
The last part of the session was a round of Q&As which was interesting.
Someone on Reddit (“ma_clare”) copied down the questions being asked (you can read them here) — my impression was that the answers to these questions were pretty general (e.g., “yes we are doing several things related to that” or “the best way for you to help is to get involved”) which are really not that helpful.
All in all, it was an interesting meeting but definitely left a lot to be desired.
Alright now let me tell you what I think.
First of all, props to these guys for putting it together; you can tell that they’ve spent a lot of time genuinely trying to improve the profession.
However, I see a few potential issues with the way this is approached:
1. It might be a bit too corporate-ish.
Not sure how to describe this but it feels a lot like a politician telling people, “yes we have committees and initiatives to help us reach our goal.” Basically, a lot of words but not really saying a whole lot. I think some specific milestones or roadmaps could help.
2. Too ambitious
The ex-COO/CFO of Instacart, Ravi Gupta, once said this:
My advice to people when they are thinking about instituting a new process is to go to a whiteboard and write down the answer to this question: “If you could only get one thing done this year, what would it be?”.
If that answer is “institute some new process”, go for it. But if it’s something like “increase market share from 30% to 60%” or “launch this new product that will 2x our TAM”, don’t waste your time on anything else. Just take your best person (up to and including the CEO), make them responsible for solving that problem, and give them everything and everyone they need to make it happen.”
In other words, everyone should concentrate on one singular focus rather than diverting resources to 10 different things.
Kind of like drawing vectors – 10 vectors going in the same direction get you a lot farther than having arrows going in all directions.
3. They either missed, or purposely avoided talking about “money”?
It is true that many are in this profession because they love the challenge and the work. But if the money can’t keep up, we will have problems keeping and attracting talents down the road (or even now).
In fact, more money also means more resources for the “key initiatives” and which can get us closer to the “vision.”
But how? I have several ideas — we'll save that for another day.
And that’s all for now – thanks for reading!
Let me know what you think in the comments below.